Executive Summary
The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method is the most theoretically sound methodology for evaluating a company's intrinsic value, calculating enterprise value by converting future cash flows into present value. With global private equity LBO deal volume reaching$150.3 billionin the first half of 2025 alone, already at 70% of the previous year's total, the importance of DCF-based precision valuation is becoming increasingly prominent.1
This content approaches the core components of DCF valuation—estimating Free Cash Flow,calculating WACC, anddetermining Terminal Value—from a practical perspective. It proposes a framework example to enhance the accuracy of investment decisions through scenario-based hypothesis testing. Unfortunately, due to limitations in disclosing all information, we will selectively present illustrative examples.
1. Theoretical Basis of DCF Valuation
1.1) Core Principles of DCF
DCF is an approach that adheres strictly to the fundamental principle of financial theory: "The value of a company is the sum of the present values of its future cash flows." It is recognized as the most fundamental valuation method because it calculates intrinsic value based on the company's inherent cash-generating ability, without relying on market sentiment or comparable company multiples.
- DCF Basic FormulaDCF=t=1∑n(1+r)tFCFt+(1+r)nTV
- Estimated Period
- Free Cash Flow (FCF)
- r: Discount Rate
- TV: Terminal Value
1.2) Why DCF?
| Evaluation Method | Advantages | Limits | Suitable situations |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | Intrinsic value assessment, reflecting growth potential | High household sensitivity | Growth companies, M&A, IPO |
| Comparable | Easy to calculate, market-reflective | Subjectivity in Selecting Comparable Companies | Quick Valuation |
| Asset-based | Objective asset value | Limitations of Intangible Asset Valuation | Liquidation value, asset-intensive |
For S Company's investment organization, preliminary evaluations are conducted internally, utilizing DCF analysis during this process.
It is primarily used in Series C to D funding rounds, IPO preparations, and M&A negotiations for companies with predictable revenue structures, such as SaaS, fintech, and healthtech firms.
2. Free Cash Flow (FCF) Estimate
2.1) Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) vs Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) is the cash flow attributable to all corporate stakeholders (shareholders + creditors), while Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) is the cash flow attributable solely to shareholders.
| Category | FCFF | Free Cash Flow to Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Justice | Cash distributable to all capital providers after operating activities | Cash distributable to shareholders after debt repayment |
| Mountain formula | EBIT(1-t) + Depreciation & Amortization – Capital Expenditures – Change in Net Working Capital | FCFF – Interest expense (1-t) + Net debt |
| Discount rate | WACC | Cost of Equity |
| Applicable | Enterprise Value Calculation | Direct Calculation of Equity Value |
FCFF Calculation Formula
2.2) Estimation Framework: Five-Year Forecast
[Example: SaaS Tech Startup A]
| Item | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Revenue (KRW billion) | 500 | 650 | 845 | 1,014 | 1,166 |
| Sales Growth Rate | 30% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 15% |
| EBIT Margin | 8% | 10% | 12% | 14% | 15% |
| EBIT | 40 | 65 | 101 | 142 | 175 |
| EBIT after tax | 32 | 52 | 81 | 113 | 140 |
| D&A | 25 | 33 | 42 | 51 | 58 |
| Capital Expenditures | (50) | (65) | (85) | (81) | (70) |
| ΔNWC | (15) | (20) | (26) | (22) | (19) |
| FCFF | (8) | 0 | 12 | 61 | 109 |
- Key Assumptions
3. Calculation of WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital)
3.1) WACC Formula
- E/VEquity ratio
- D/V: Proportion of Third-Party Capital
- reCost of Equity
- rdCost of Debt
- tCorporate tax rate
3.2) Calculating the Cost of Equity: CAPM
Input values at the time of review
| Variable | Price | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Risk-free interest raterf) | 3.8% | 10-year Korean government bond yield |
| Market Risk Premiumrm -rf) | 5.5% | Historical Average ERP |
| Betaβ) | 1.2 | Industry Average Beta (Tech Sector) |
| Size Premium(α) | 2.0% | Additional risk for small and mid-cap stocks |
| Cost of Equity | 12.4% | 3.8% + 1.2 × 5.5% + 2.0% |
3.3) Example of WACC Calculation
| Category | specific gravity | Cost | Post-tax adjustment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity (E) | 70% | 12.4% | 8.68% |
| Debt Capital (D) | 30% | 5.0% | 1.05% (after tax) |
| WACC | – | – | 9.73% |
[Tip] Recent research indicates that when applying DCF analysis to Indonesian retail company AMRT (
), using a WACC of 11.27%, Cost of Equity of 12.11%, and a terminal growth rate of 5.50% resulted in an Enterprise Value of 114.87 trillion rupiah.2
4. Terminal Value Calculation
4.1) Two Approaches
| Method | Official | Suitable situations |
|---|---|---|
| Permanent Growth Model | TV = WACC − gFCFn+1 | Sustainable Growth Company |
| Exit Multiple | TV = EBITDA × Exit Multiple | M&A Exit Forecast |
[Example: SaaS Tech Startup A]
- Terminal Value Application of the Permanent Growth Model
- Terminal Value Apply Multiple Exits
4.2) Cross-validation of the two methods
| Method | Terminal Value | Present Value (5-year discount) | Enterprise Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent Growth Model | 154.5 billion won | 97 billion won | 108.4 billion won |
| Exit Multiple | 186.4 billion won | 117 billion won | 128.5 billion won |
| Average | – | 107 billion won | 118.5 billion won |
5. Scenario Analysis: 3P Framework
5.1) Hypothesis Verification Matrix
Valuation analysis applies the Possibility,Plausibility,and Probabilityframework to validate the reliability of DCF assumptions. (Refer to Professor Damodaran's materials)3)
| Initial verification items | possibility | Feasibility | plausibility | Overall Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales growth rate 30% → 15% | ✅ Possible | ✅ Valid | 🔶 Midpoint | Fluctuates according to market maturity |
| EBIT Margin 15% | ✅ Possible | ✅ Valid | ✅ High | Conservative relative to the industry average |
| WACC 9.73% | ✅ Possible | ✅ Valid | ✅ High | Reflecting the current interest rate environment |
| Permanent growth rate of 2.5% | ✅ Possible | ✅ Valid | ✅ High | Long-term GDP growth rate level |
5.2) Sensitivity Analysis
Example: Enterprise Value Changes for SaaS Tech Startup A Based on WACC vs. Permanent Growth Rate (Unit: KRW billion)
| WACC↓ / g→ | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5% | 1,170 | 1,256 | 1,357 | 1,476 | 1,619 |
| 9.0% | 1,075 | 1,148 | 1,233 | 1,332 | 1,449 |
| 9.73% | 957 | 1,016 | 1,084 | 1,161 | 1,251 |
| 10.5% | 855 | 903 | 956 | 1,017 | 1,087 |
| 11.0% | 798 | 840 | 886 | 939 | 999 |
- Key Insights
- A 100-basis-point change in WACC causes an8–10%fluctuation in enterprise value.
- A 50-basis-point change in the permanent growth rate causes a±5–7%fluctuation in enterprise value.
In the above case, risk flag: TV overweight case
The fact that Terminal Value accounts for 87–93% of Enterprise Value raises serious doubts about the reliability of DCF analysis. When handling investment strategy for Company O or Company S, a common practice is to re-examine the robustness of assumptions if the TV weight exceeds 60-70%.
That is, a re-examination is conducted regarding the aforementioned "Initial Verification Items (Possibility, Plausibility, Probability)."As a recommended countermeasurein responseto this,
- Adjustment of Profitability Improvement Timeline: Consider extending the timeline for achieving a 15% EBIT margin
- Extended Forecast Period: Expanded from 5 years to 7–10 years, reducing TV's share
- Parallel Use of Multiple Exit Methods: Strengthening Cross-Validation Compared to the Permanent Growth Model
- Growth Rate Assumption Review: Examining the Realistic Feasibility of the 30%→20%→15% Growth Rate Pattern for Y1 to Y5
6. Limitations and Complementary Approaches to DCF
6.1) The Fundamental Limitations of DCF
Multiples (such as PER and EV/EBITDA) face criticism for having a weak theoretical foundation and being essentially products of market practice and convenience. However, DCF also has the following limitations.
- Sensitivity of Assumptions: Small changes in key assumptions such as discount rates, growth rates, and margins significantly impact results.
- Limitations for early-stage companies: Not suitable for pre-revenue companies where cash flow forecasting is difficult
- Market Discrepancy: Potential for a Long-Term Gap Between Intrinsic Value and Market Price
6.2) Complementary Framework: Numbers + Narratives
Professor Aswath Damodaran of NYU Stern points out, "A narrative without numbers is merely storytelling, and numbers without a narrative are merely modeling." To enhance the completeness of DCF analysis,
- 5-Step Narrative to Numbers Process
- Business Narrative Development: Defining Your Company's Growth Story
- Narrative Test: Verification of Consistency with Market Reality
- Value Driver Linkage: Converting Narratives into Financial Variables
- Valuation Execution: DCF Model Development and Analysis
- Feedback Loop: Performance-Based Verification and Narrative Adjustment
Conclusion
DCF valuation is the most theoretically robust methodology for assessing a company's intrinsic value. However, its advantage of making all assumptions explicit simultaneously demands a high level of responsibility regarding the accuracy of those assumptions.
As of 2026, in an overheated market environment where AI startups command Revenue Multiples of10x to 50x, it remains to be seen whether DCF will serve asan anchor,unaffected by market sentiment.
For a better DCF analysis,
- Establish a solid business narrativefirst,
- Converting thisinto verifiable numbers
- Test assumptions through various scenarios
- Cross-validation with market datamust be performed.
Numbers alone are merely modeling,and stories alone are merely storytelling.4)
Endnotes
- https://soferadvisors.com/insights/blog/what-are-the-discounted-cash-flow-techniques-a-guide/
https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/articles/2025/9/large-deals-push-leveraged-buyout-total-higher-private-equity-entry-value-grows-92394291 ↩︎ - https://serambi.org/index.php/jemr/article/view/1036 ↩︎
- https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2014/07/possible-plausible-and-probable-big.html
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLvnJL8htRR1T9cbSccaoVw ↩︎ - https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2014/06/numbers-and-narrative-modeling-story.html ↩︎

Leave a comment